<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.securityprocedure.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>NIST-SP</title>
 <link>http://www.securityprocedure.com/tag/nist-sp</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Review of Business Continuity Management Framework</title>
 <link>http://www.securityprocedure.com/review-business-continuity-management-framework</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Recent natural disaster, such as earth quake or tsunami is true evidence that all business operation need appropriate business continuity management.  Today, there are a lot of world standard that could be followed to get the best implementation of business continuity management. From the US standard: NIST SP 800-34 to British Standard 25999. Here is simple comparison between to standard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securityprocedure.com/review-business-continuity-management-framework&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.securityprocedure.com/review-business-continuity-management-framework#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.securityprocedure.com/tag/bs25999">BS25999</category>
 <category domain="http://www.securityprocedure.com/tag/business-impact-analysis">Business Impact Analysis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.securityprocedure.com/tag/contingency">Contingency</category>
 <category domain="http://www.securityprocedure.com/tag/nist-sp">NIST-SP</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:47:27 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>root</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">54 at http://www.securityprocedure.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
